Letters - FRFI 251 Jun/Jul 2016

Boycott the EU referendum

The coming European referendum will inevitably bear the stain of Britain’s bloody partition of Ireland. The wording on the ballot will read: ‘Should the United Kingdom [ie, Britain and Northern Ireland] remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?’ Socialists who participate in the forthcoming European referendum, indeed in any UK-wide referendum, will be giving legitimacy to the idea that the British have the right to vote on behalf of the Irish. Rather than succumb to the chauvinism of the labour aristocracy, socialists should raise the slogan: ‘Honour the 1918 referendum on Irish Independence!’

There is another, equally important reason why the RCG should initiate a boycott of the referendum. As the international capitalist system plunges into ever deepening crises, and as inter-imperialist conflicts grow ever more acute, the British ruling class, as David Yaffe has explained, ‘will have to make a choice between Europe and the United States.’ (FRFI 194, December 2006/January 2007.) Anyone who thoughtfully applies Yaffe’s analysis to the current situation will arrive at the conclusion that participation in the European referendum will mean support for one faction of British imperialism against another.

Read more ...

Letters - FRFI 250 April/May 2016

Targeting Broadwater Farm

Simon Elmer’s article in FRFI 249, ‘The blitzkrieg of London housing estates’, shows the full ambition of the ‘social cleansing’ project. I would like to add that the government is not just interested in the transfer of public property into private hands for economic reasons. It is also making calculated political preparations for the future.

As the country faces the threat of another economic recession, plans are being drawn up to contain and control opposition. Broadwater Farm Estate in Tottenham is targeted for ‘dispersal’ because it has a long history of community organisation and resistance to racist police attack. The Residents and Tenants Association and the Broadwater Farm Youth Association have led the fight against the estate’s decline for the last 30 years, generating local employment and monitoring racist harassment.

For these reasons the estate has long been viewed as a threat to ‘public order’. Sir Kenneth Newman, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police from 1982 to 1987 had the estate top of his list of ‘symbolic locations’, along with Railton Road, Brixton and All Saints Road in Notting Hill. As a former Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, and detective in the Palestine Police Force under the British Mandate, Newman developed his policy of ‘low level surveillance’ and ‘targeting individuals’. He said that   multi-ethnic communities should be subjected to ‘social control measures... as though they are terrorists’. He spoke about policing ‘ethnic ghettos’ to enforce ‘communal security’. This is how the repression of Muslim communities is being carried out today.

Of course the state can unleash sheer repression and terror against any section of the working class that defends itself against economic assault and state racism. But demolishing working class estates is another way for the ruling class to defend its interests. Broadwater Farm Estate is on the top of the list because of the long track record of resistance to impoverishment and discrimination.

Susan Davidson

North London


No to the academisation of our schools!

I teach at a community school in Camden, north London. Its achievements are evidence that state education works and is best placed to meet the unique needs of local communities. The recent announcement that every school will be an academy by 2022 is the latest in a succession of decisions which illustrate just how gravely the government misunderstands how our education system works.

We do not need academisation. We do not want it because it will not improve our schools.

As educational professionals we know what the priorities are in our schools. We know what is required to meet the needs of the young people we teach:

  • adequate funding to ensure the invaluable contributions of every member of every team can continue;
  • the space and time in our schools to enable our learners to learn in a way that actually benefits them;
  • to stop obsessing about meaningless outcomes and start properly focusing on the learning process;
  • meaningful systems of assessment;
  • parent and teacher governors because we need our schools to be run by people who understand and care about them.

And we need a Department for Education that actually understands the complicated world of education, or is at the very least willing to listen and learn from the people who do know.

We need to stand together and send a clear message to the government that these are our schools, that we as educational professionals know best, that governmental changes are making it increasingly impossible for teachers to support the students they care so much about and that the government has to stop and listen and start working with us if we are to ensure that our young people have the start in life they deserve.

Megan

North London


Why we should stay in the European Union

The June referendum on UK membership of the European Union has major implications across the political spectrum.

Lining up for staying ‘in’ are the Cameron wing of the Conservative Party, the LibDems, most of the Labour Party, SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Greens.

Those calling for a ‘leave’ vote include UKIP, Tory Eurosceptics, the far-right and most of the British left groupings such as the Communist Party, SWP, Socialist Party, Counterfire and Respect. The RCG has, it seems, yet to declare but seems to be leaning towards abstention.

The right-wing mainstream of the Leave camp (Brexit) is nationalistic, xenophobic towards migrants and Islamophobic. It supports a deregulation of commerce and industry adverse to the interests of the working class. It has no post-Brexit plan but a generalised atavistic nostalgia for Empire and national super-power status.

Conversely the left groups who support Brexit do so both in protest at the savage debt recovery forced onto Greece by the IMF, ECB and EU and against the ‘democratic deficit’ of the EU.

But Eurocapitalist brutality against Greece is essentially no different to any other capitalist brutality. How is the ‘democratic deficit’ of the EU any worse than the Westminster museum of first-past-the-post MPs, unelected Upper House, unwritten Constitution, in-house corporate lobbyists, shackled trade unions, and the muddled powers of the established Church, civil service and monarchy?

The European Union is a higher form of government than its constituent nation states. It has subsumed the Franco-German rivalry of the last two centuries and the Benelux national boundaries. It leads the world in civil, workers’ and LGBT rights and justice, health and safety, environmental protection, renewable energy, climate action and food standards. Its greater mobility to work, live and study should be championed and extended by all progressives.

British socialism, like all national socialism, is an oxymoron; patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Leaving the European Union will bring a carnival of racist, deregulated reaction. Such a move has no resonance with the anti-austerity parties and groups of southern Europe. Internationalists, Red or Green, should and must engage with the continent of Europe and with its Union to unite its struggles for revolutionary transformation.

Tim Summers (Green Party)

South London


 

… and

Why we should leave the European Union

While the EU referendum is of little interest to the working class, who are oppressed by capital whether its policies come from Brussels or London, it has caused a great divide in the bourgeois political class. Petty bourgeois businesses are in favour of leaving on the basis that less regulation will allow them to be more competitive in a market dominated by transnational corporations, who benefit massively from the free movement of capital. There is, on the contrary, a tendency within the broad left to support the Union, pointing to a handful of directives and regulations that have benefited workers and unions.

This ignores the role the EU has played in facilitating the interests of transnational corporations, allowing them a platform to lobby across states as well as enforcing neoliberal market discipline. The European Round Table of Industrialists, an influential lobbying group, pushed for market and monetary union as well as eastern expansion since the 1980s. They were pivotal in pushing for the mass sell-off of state assets in Eastern Europe during the 1990s and early 2000s, leading to dramatic declines in the standard of living and making these states reliant on Western capital and exporting cheap, low-skill goods to the West. The EU’s aggressive behaviour in relation to Greece demonstrates that the Union will not allow even reformist social democracy and will no doubt stand in the way of genuine socialist revolution. We must never forget that the EU is a bourgeois institution serving bourgeois interests and will eventually have to be challenged in order for the European working class to seize the means of production.

Ryan

Egham

FRFI welcomes further contributions to this debate. There will an article about the EU referendum in the next issue of the paper.


Justice for Kevan

A massive thank you to everyone who made it to my protest outside the Ministry of Justice in February. It was unfortunate the Supreme Court decided to give its judgment on Joint Enterprise at the same time, splitting my supporters, but the positive news gave a boost to everyone. On the day, a Dedicated Search Team was sent to trash my cell in an obvious scare tactic: the result is my decision to call another event for 21 July, 12.30-2.30pm to show we will not tolerate this abuse. This time, though, the target will be the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman headquarters in London, who have repeatedly refused to make the required recommendations to help improve my situation.

I have now spent six years detained within the notorious Close Supervision Centre (CSC) based on allegations proven in court to be false. Many of you will have seen the propaganda spread through the media by the MOJ about me, in order to reduce concern from the public regarding my mistreatment. Without more support the prison service will be emboldened to use increased levels of torture against me. Please take the time to attend the protest this summer. You can also sign my petition atwww.change.org/8/justice-for-kevan.

Kevan Thakrar A4097AE

HMP Wakefield CSC, 5 Love Walk, West Yorkshire WF2 9AG

Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! 250 April/May 2016


 

Occupy the universities, unite students and workers! (Website only due to limited space)

I've been reading about the Free University of Sheffield and their occupation of the Richard Roberts Auditorium and it is upsetting that they have now stopped the occupation, due to court orders issued by the University of Sheffield. I have absolute respect, solidarity and support for what they did in challenging the growing marketisation of higher education. However, upon their occupation of the university, I was concerned that their initial statement, stated that 'There are those who entirely fault management, and even individual academics...This is not our belief: we want to extend an olive branch to the managerial university. Despite its complicity with the decimation of the public university...our struggle is against this government and the neoliberal society' and that is where the problems lie.  A massive issue on the left in Britain is avoiding the emphasis on words like 'socialism/communism' and 'capitalism', emphasising words instead like 'this government', 'neoliberalism' and 'austerity' avoiding the idea that this would happen under all forms of capitalism and a truly free and democratic education can't happen under capitalism, even if you vote for Corbyn.

Despite making very reasonable demands, such as more student-teacher involvement, resistance to PREVENT, the HE Green Paper and the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), as well as fighting against the casualisation of academic workers; as far as I can tell, they had no direct, revolutionary theory which is crucial alongside revolutionary practice to make an impact. I do hope that we all take notes and lessons from what they did and organise again in the future to try and dismantle the university and re-build it based on the ideas of a radical, critical pedagogy that promotes education as a practice of freedom. In order to achieve the free and democratic education engaged in a radical pedagogy, students need to be in solidarity with the workers in building an independent, socialist movement that breaks away from the Labour Party and the NUS (National Union of Students) and seizes the means of production, the likes of which can never happen by voting for NUS candidates, MPs or going to a demo or two.

We need absolute solidarity with all marginalised and oppressed students and workers of the world in order to dismantle the bourgeois state and build a socialist, workers state. Only then can the process of dismantling, decolonising and democratising the education system start to take effect towards the process of communism. But overall, I do have a lot of respect and solidarity for the Free University of Sheffield and their occupation and I do encourage and hope to see more of this happening in the UK (and the world ideally), which we are currently seeing as I write this, the student occupation at Sussex University over the deportation of a student, Luqman Onikosi. As communists and Marxist-Leninists, it is vital that we show our critical support and solidarity to the occupations of universities, but at the same time, engage in discussions and criticisms of such occupations in order to build a strong, organised student and workers movement, united in the building of socialism, at which point, can the transformation of education at all levels begin on a mass scale. I just don't think you can do so by being all 'respectable' to the toxic, bourgeois elements of the university that make it a space where neoliberal, imperialist capitalism thrives and preserves the status quo in maintaining Britain's status as an imperialist country. 

Victory to all marginalised and oppressed students and workers of the world!

Sylvia McCheyne, Manchester

Letters -FRFI 249 Feb/Mar 2016

Bedroom tax victory

January 2016 marked an all too rare victory in the struggle against austerity. The Court of Appeal found in two cases that the so-called ‘spare room subsidy’, more correctly described as the Bedroom Tax, was ‘discriminatory and unlawful’ in relation to domestic violence victims with specially-adapted properties and families with severely disabled children.

The hated Bedroom Tax has caused huge additional suffering for the working class. Those whom the local authority deems to have a spare room have seen their housing benefit cut by 14%; two thirds of those affected have fallen into rent arrears and one in seven have received eviction risk letters. A study in the Journal of Public Health concluded that the tax had ‘increased poverty and had broad-ranging adverse effects on health, well-being and social relationships’.

One case was brought by a victim of domestic abuse, identified simply as ‘A’, who lives in a property with a designated panic room. The second was brought by the grandparents of a severely disabled teenager. Paul and Susan Rutherford also suffer from disability. Their three-bedroom bungalow was designed to allow carers to stay overnight. The High Court had dismissed their case in 2014.

This victory could have a major impact on the lives of thousands of people. Inevitably, in a typically punitive and mean move, the Department for Work and Pensions has sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court to defend its right to hound some of the most vulnerable people in society into poverty and despair.

RYAN KNIGHT

Egham


Floods and cuts in Lancashire

The recent floods which caused great damage to Lancashire and Cumbria areas have exposed how the government and councils do not care about the people on the ground. The Environment Agency’s funding for flood assets has fallen by 14%, and councils were inflicted with budget cuts of up to 40%, so funding to drainage boards and landowners who controlled river defence systems had to be reduced or cut altogether. There are even reports that the government were aware of the upcoming storms, but still did nothing to stop the serious damage that occurred; around 1,400 people are now homeless, and at least two people were killed. There has even been a £4m flood defence that has been scheduled for Kendal since 2011; it has yet to be realised. The flood budget for Lancashire is to be cut by 12% next year.

Meanwhile Lancaster’s majority Labour council offers nothing but more austerity. Under the budget put forward in November 2015 there are plans to axe the equivalent of 367 full-time jobs to help save £65m over the next two years. Other proposals include: removing funding for subsidised bus services; reducing libraries from 74 to 34 and closing five museums. It is of utmost importance that we organise.

LIAM WHEAR

Lancaster


Venezuela: lessons from Nicaragua

The recent defeat of the Chavista movement by the US-backed bourgeois opposition in the 6 December elections was welcomed by the BBC’s Radio 4 and others as ‘the end of the country’s socialist experiment’. But is it?

First of all, a little perspective. Starting with the 1999 presidential elections, this is the eighteenth national poll which the movement created by the late Hugo Chavez has contested, and only its second-ever defeat. All this it has achieved on the basis of mass popular support for its health, educational and land reform programmes and in the face of vicious US hostility expressed in the organisation of violence, economic sabotage and attempted coup (in April 2002).

Much soul-searching is taking place within the Chavista movement as to the causes of the recent setback and how to prevent it being repeated in the 2019 presidential elections. Venezuela has a large private sector and the country’s former governing coalition, the PSUV, is heterogenous, uniting worker and peasant forces with the Bolivarian bourgeoisie. While Chavez made no secret of his distrust of this ‘boliburguesia’, its influence on policy was significant and harmful, even during his presidency. Its influence seems to have grown under Maduro. In practical terms this has involved the Chavista forces in interminable dialogue with the very bourgeois forces that, egged on and funded by the Yankees, are seeing to overthrow them. The left of Chavismo has been sidelined and a large part of the worker and peasant base demoralised. This scenario is sadly reminiscent of Nicaragua in the late 1980s. In the face of unrelenting US-organised mercenary wars and economic blockade, the Sandinista government adopted its own version of perestroika.

This did not work, as the Sandinistas’ defeat in Nicaragua’s 1990 elections suggests and such tendencies in Venezuela are not likely to have any more success. As the Sandinistas’ founder Augusto Cesar Sandino put it: ‘Because of the direction the struggle is taking, the cowardly and vacillating forces are abandoning us. Only the workers and peasants will go all the way, only their organised strength will achieve victory.’

MIKE WEBBER

Aylesbury


Join the protest against the brutal Close Supervision Centres

Within the high security prison estate in England are hidden small torture units known as Close Supervision Centres (CSCs). The CSC system has been notorious for its brutality since it began back in 1998 yet has been allowed to expand at massive cost to the prisons budget. In 2001 another more oppressive level to the CSC was created, labelled the Exceptional Risk Unit (ERU), based at HMP Wakefield and able to hold a maximum of eight prisoners in solitary confinement. This was increased to 12 in 2012. In total approximately 50 prisoners are held in CSCs around the country

I am currently located in the Wakefield ERU, where I am subject to constant brutality and racist abuse. A protest has been organised in February in collaboration with many groups and individuals’ including MOJUK, FRFI, JENGA, Crossroads Women’s Centre and Movement for Justice against my ongoing politically motivated detention within these units, and to highlight the CSC’s barbaric and inhumane environment. Please make the time to attend this event, and write to your MP demanding change. I thank you all in advance for your much needed support.

KEVAN THAKRAR A4907AE

HMP Wakefield (CSC),

5 Love Lane,

Wakefield WF2 9AG

www.justiceforkevan.com

Join the protest:

Thursday 18 February 12.30pm–2.30pm,

outside HM Prison Service Headquarters, Clive House,

70 Petty France,

London SW1H 9EX


Hands off John Bowden!

Just to remind readers of FRFI that long-term prisoner John Bowden will be on trial at Greenock Sheriff Court on 11 March, from 10am.

John has been writing and organising in defence of prisoners’ rights for over 30 years. For this he is the target of screws’ brutality and the authorities refuse to let him be released. This latest assault charge is another attempt to keep him behind bars long after the tariff on his life sentence has expired.

Supporters of FRFI are calling on everyone to pack the public gallery in support of John and all those prisoners who face the brutality of the Scottish prison service officers at Greenock Prison and elsewhere. A victory for John would be a victory for all!

DOMINIC MULGREW

Glasgow FRFI


Season’s greetings

’Tis the season to be jolly, even if it won’t be by the time you get this. Thank you for your solidarity and continuing to send me FRFI for all these years. I wish more institutions on our side of the barricade had the capacity to endure and roll the struggle forward as you do. but maybe the new year will bring more of that. Solidarity! The future holds promise.

BILL DUNNE

USP Santa Barbara, California, US


Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! 249 February/March 2016

Letters - FRFI 248 Dec 2015/Jan 2016

Slave labour is good for business

In the 1930s work camps were established for the unemployed. This process is again unfolding in Britain today.

I have been unemployed for a little under three years. At first, I was claiming Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) due to my poor mental health, reliance on alcohol and suicidal urges. ATOS judged me fit for work. My ESA was stopped. After a prolonged period of destitution, I signed on to Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA). My first claim was short-lived: a sanction for not using the correct website terrified me. I chose destitution over support. Recently, I have signed on to JSA again. Two weeks following my claim – before I had received any money – I was assigned a work placement, on pain of sanction.

I presently work 35 hours a week, without pay. I am a receptionist at an optician’s. To attain this placement, I had to undergo an interview and a trial period of two days. My ‘employer’, with a great deal of difficulty, has decided to take on a slave. However, they inform me that ‘this is not a ‘nine-to-five job’ and that I must show initiative. Alongside my duties – booking appointments, greeting customers – I have been given two tasks that are ‘above and beyond’ my station: I must reorganise a filing cabinet and create graphics to communicate how eyesight works to children. I reiterate: I am unwaged and my ‘employers’ will own all intellectual property that I have produced under their ‘care’.

My ‘boss’ gave me the details of his business plan last week. It involves keeping labour costs incredibly low: the short-term allocation of free labour from the Jobcentre to his establishment is by no means an accident. Slavery, it seems, is simply good business.

PETER THOMPSON

Newcastle


Abolish zero-hours contracts

Nobody, I think, has the idea that working in a fast food restaurant qualifies as a good or enjoyable job. I am an employee of Domino’s Pizza, working in customer service. There are of course the common negative experiences arising from clueless management, rude customers, and the strenuous nature of the work itself. But besides the content of the work, the form of work is a major, and perhaps more hidden and subversive, way in which fast food companies maintain a hold on employees’ lives and continue to dehumanise employees to little more than a commodity. The ill-effects of this have been intensified by the proliferation of ‘zero-hours contracts’.

Zero-hours contracts are sold to the public as being more ‘flexible’ and being able to suit the employment requirements of both businesses and employees. They have allowed fast-food businesses easily to overcome high labour costs in an industry with often-varying labour demands. Those of us who are employed on such contracts, however, are under no illusion about the power imbalances resulting in a workforce forever at the beck and call of their employers, sometimes only given notice of shifts an hour or so in advance, with an unreliable income as hours vary from practically non-existent to overwhelming.

The unpredictability of work and the lack of notice can result in intense isolation as it becomes almost impossible to arrange anything outside work – after all, you might have to suddenly drop everything you’re doing to go to work. The fact that zero-hours contracts often coincide with low (minimum) wages also contributes to this omnipresent wariness, as when you can’t predict the size of your next payslip, even the smallest luxury is tainted with guilt and caution.

Of course, these damaging experiences are of little consequence to management. There is no concern for the comfort or well-being of employees any more than there need be concern for the ‘well-being’ of a pizza. An employee plays the same commodified role to management as the goods they sell or create. The most important factor for the employers is to meet labour cost targets, delivery time targets and so on. Therefore managers make full use of the ‘flexibility’ of being able to call in employees at a moment’s notice, sending workers home even when they’re still needed at the store, and cutting corners by ‘clocking-out’ food before it is made or sent out on delivery. We need to demand the abolition of zero-hours contracts.

ALICIA MAYNES

Nottingham


Political repression in Galiza

Galiza is an oppressed nation of nearly two million people which has managed to preserve its own language and culture. The post-Franco ‘transition period’ paved the way for Spain to become a western capitalist democracy included in the EEC and NATO, by means of denying the right of peoples to self-determination and political repression against those who saw the ‘transition’ as a way to maintain the old oligarchic model. Since then, Galician militants have undergone political assassination, prosecution, torture, communication intercepts, solitary confinement and dispersal of prisoners.

In September 2013, the Spanish High Court conveniently claimed the existence of an armed group called Resistencia Galega, so that from that moment any Galician militant on trial could be accused of ‘terrorism’. At the end of October 2015, military police broke in and arrested nine people in their homes, throwing around the same accusations of ‘glorifying terrorism’ and ‘belonging to an armed group’, although all detainees’ activities just involve open political work in support of the nationalist project. Without any evidence, the judge accepted the police accusations and banned the organisation Causa Galiza for two years.

The persistence of political repression has caused the emergence of groups in solidarity with victims of state repression. Ceivar is a group that campaigns in support of Galician prisoners, organising protests and coordinating with prisoners’ families. For that reason, we congratulate FRFI for the great work in support of those imprisoned for their nationalist and revolutionary ideas.

ERMELINDA BARREIRO

militant for the independence of Galiza, Spain


Fight fracking! Resist eviction!

On 4 December, the longest-running anti-fracking camp, at Upton on the outskirts of Chester, faces eviction. The camp was set up in April 2014 to oppose ‘coal bed methane gas’, the evil twin of shale gas. Dart Energy has a licence to explore for this gas which expires in May 2016.

The camp became known as Upton Community Protection Camp and has huge local support: 85% of local residents in a recent survey were opposed to Dart Energy’s plans for the site. The camp is the longest running anti-fracking camp in the UK and the first to occupy the actual site where the drilling is intended. Residents grow some of their own food and various structures have been built on the site including a Solidarity Tea Hut for communal use. This camp has been, and still is, the only thing preventing iGas from drilling an exploratory fracking well.

On 6 November the High Court in Manchester granted an eviction order giving the campaigners 28 days to leave the site. The eviction can therefore take place anytime after the 4 December 2015.

Since then, campaigners from across the country have come to live on the site, building resistance by constructing towers, tunnels, tree houses, making lock-ons and securing the site to ensure the eviction team do not have an easy time trying to take the site over. Meantime, an adjacent site has also been occupied, just one mile away in Mickle Trafford, as iGas also has plans for this site. So come and learn how to protect this land. Let’s put a stop to this fracking industry everywhere.

JULIET EDGAR

Liverpool


Justice for Sheku Bayoh

The Scottish National Party has been generally unsympathetic and even antagonistic regarding the nationwide campaign for Sheku Bayoh, an unarmed black man who died in police custody in Fife earlier this year. Even more so when we compare it to the recent killing of a white school student in Aberdeen, where First Minister Nicola Sturgeon showered that pupil’s family with condolences. In contrast Sheku’s family have reached out to a very silent Sturgeon to no avail. In fact SNP Cabinet Secretary for Justice Kenny MacAskill has even accused the campaign of creating a ‘poisonous atmosphere’ and declaring an ‘open season of hunting Police Scotland’.

Meanwhile recent evidence that has come to light about one of these officers. PC Alan Paton’s brother-in law, Barry Swan, told the BBC the officer had a violent and racist history. Mr Swan said he had been a witness to the aftermath of a violent rampage by Officer Paton against his own parents. The officer was also known to boast ‘I am a total racist, I hate all blacks’.

So we would ask Police Scotland and the SNP: why is a racist thug allowed to serve in our police force? Why do the SNP refuse to answer our questions? Why was an unconscious man restrained with handcuffs and leg shackles? What really happened to Sheku Bayoh?

AMINA

Dundee

Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! 248 December 2015/January 2016

Beyond parody: Southwark's new fat cat role

'We’ll be honest. These are big roles. Budgets are down. And we’re aiming high.' So starts Southwark Labour Council's recent job advert. By aiming high, they mean paying a lot; £96,909 - £122,310 per year plus benefits. And the big role? 'Director of Modernise'. The council were immediately criticised for the ridiculous job-title, likened to the spoof job 'Director of Better' from recent BBC comedy W1A. Except there is nothing funny about it. And they certainly aren't being honest.

It's one of three highly-paid directorships, all aimed at trying to make social cleansing and council cuts palatable by dressing it up as regeneration and modernisation.

Their slick job advert claims 'we don’t just work for the community, we work with them'. In reality, social cleansing is well underway; any communities left are being forced out. The area's Heygate estate has been demolished. The council's role is criminal; the land was sold at just £50 million to private company Lend Lease, despite being valued at £150 million. The council paid a further £65 million to 'decant' the residents. It is destroying more council housing as it gets to work on the Aylesbury estate. There is a rush to construct private housing that no-one can afford. The job-advert ends with the line 'Unleash the Spirit of Southwark'. Not letting the new post-holders forget about the Heygate, Aylesbury, exploitative private landlords and cuts will be in the right spirit.

Rachel Francis