Boycott the racist school census: Keep border controls out of our classrooms

school census

The Home Office has admitted that it intends to use data from this year’s school census to create a ‘hostile environment’ for migrant children. For the first time, from October 2016, the school census includes questions about nationality and country of birth. The Department of Education will pass on information on up to 1,500 children a month to immigration officials, bringing the UK Border Agency right into Britain’s classrooms. The information is used to track down and deport migrant children and their families. When some schools and nurseries in Hackney, in east London, collected nationality information in July 2016 the result was the deportation of up to 50 schoolchildren. The RCG and other activists such as Against Borders for Children (ABC) have been mobilising against the January 2017 census, encouraging all parents to show solidarity and exercise their right to write ‘refused’ next to these intrusive and patently racist questions.

This racist census is the latest assault in a much longer trajectory of the British state targeting the children of migrants. In 2013 the government discussed excluding children with ‘irregular’ immigration status from schools; in 2015 the then Education Secretary Nicky Morgan called for a review of ‘education tourism’ and how much it is a ‘pull factor’ for migrants. Theresa May wanted the 2016 Immigration Act to legislate for the withdrawal of school places for children with irregular immigration status, and called for schools to check passports before accepting new pupils. This was rejected by other government officials – in favour of placing a legal duty on schools to collect pupils’ nationality and country of birth data via the census.

Read more ...

Racism in education suspensions

Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! 1 – November/December 1979

The case of the young Rastafarian in Leeds is but one example of the vicious intolerance of the teaching profession and its desperate need to keep control and discipline over the pupils.

In June 1979 there was a public meeting instigated by the United Black Women's Action Group to tackle the immediate problems affecting black children in Haringey schools. Within the last year, and within the London Education Authority alone, black parents have met in Camden, Hackney and Brixton to organise their protests against the treatment their children are receiving from the schools. At a recent meeting of the Islington Committee for Community Relations a speaker from the Caribbean Teachers' Association described school common-rooms as 'citadels of prejudice' and urged action on racism in schools.

For the first time an organised and determined section of the working class is demanding justice and accountability from the teaching profession. For the first time pupils, victims of a second-rate education system, are insisting that their needs be met and their demands heard by teachers. It is from within the black community (and its supporters) that this independent and class-conscious move is being made. It is in response to this independence that the institutional forms of punishment, expulsion, the ESN school, Special Units for Disruptive Pupils and especially informal Suspension are being brought to bear.

In the case of black and working class children, Suspension is being used more and more as a convenient method of getting rid of unwanted pupils, of harassing them and threatening them. There have been numerous cases within the last ten years of black children being suspended for an indefinite length of time, for Afro-hair style (Haringey 1975) for wearing a 'Free Angela Davis' badge (South London 1971) for wearing a woolly hat or Tam (Islington 1976). In the well-documented case of Ladbrooke School in West London a black girl was threatened with Suspension for plaiting her hair because it was thought to be a sign of rebellion. The following day all the girls, black and white turned up with their hair in plaits to demonstrate their solidarity. In Haringey in 1979 a newly-appointed Head suspended around 20 youths at one go, all of them black. Only 5 of these pupils were suspended officially and even the Governors of the school were not informed about the incident.

The most recent forms that discipline of ‘recalcitrant' pupils has taken within the schools are Suspensions and reference to Special Units for Disruptive pupils. These are the preferred punishments at this time.

The use of expulsion as a method of ridding the schools of difficult and unwanted pupils has been found unsatisfactory by the Authorities. Under the 1944 Education Act all children must be provided with educational facilities for at least four hours a day. The expulsion of pupils merely pushes children into other schools, shifting the ‘problem' about and resulting in bargaining and deals between Head teachers. The pupils still have to be catered for within the school system.

Another institutional method that has been developed to control and punish pupils has been the setting-up of Special Units for Disruptive pupils. These are usually attached to a Comprehensive School and they have been created with a lot of talk about catering for difficult and anti-school children. It was the same language of ‘concern' that surrounded the development of the ESN (Educationally Sub-Normal) schools over ten years ago when Caribbean pupils in particular were forced into an inferior status by anti-working class and racist methods. The ESN schools that remain still have a high percentage of black children, often as much as 75070. They are, however, being phased out, largely as a result of a massive onslaught by the black community. Where they still exist they are being transformed into schools for difficult and disruptive children. The present situation is one of severe cut-backs in educational expenditure introduced by the Conservative Government in 1973 with a £182m cut, speeded up under Labour in 1976 with a £1030m cut and continued again under the present government with a planned £115m cut. The Authorities have had to slow down the introduction of the Special Units as a result of this loss of finance. Since these `sin-bins', as they are commonly called, have a low teacher/pupil ratio, schools are now finding difficulty in placing unwanted pupils.

Expulsion has been found to have only a limited effect in removing pressure from the schools since the LEA must find an alternative place for the child — ESN schools are being phased out because their racist basis has made them unacceptable to the black community—there are only sufficient places for the present 4000 pupils in the Special Units. This leaves one useful method of repression against pupils not wanted in the schools — Suspension.

While DES (Department of Education and Science) regulations say nothing definite about the length of Suspensions, no child should be out of school for more than a few days without provision being made for his or her education. In September 1978 an 11 year old black child was suspended from a Haringey school and despite the efforts of his mother, over 6 months later no alternative provision had been made for his education. The ploy of leaving his name on the register while not allowing him to attend school was a clear abuse of the intended use of Suspension as a short-term measure to arrange alternative teaching. In yet other cases, Suspension is used to banish pupils from the school premises for shorter periods ranging from one to three weeks, but repeatedly. In one Islington school at least 3 black pupils have been suspended for intervals which have added up to the loss of approximately two term's work out of the nine terms of the first three years of Secondary School.

We can see why Suspension is such a convenient tool for the discipline of pupils. It is easy to do in a situation where the Head is accountable only to the same Governing body that appointed him. It is overwhelmingly supported by teachers who see control as a matter of punishment. It is cheap. Finally, it is difficult to fight in that fellow pupils often do not know for some time that a pupil has been removed from the school.

In looking at this pattern of institutional violence directed at young people at school, the question we must ask is why are black children at the forefront of oppression by teachers?

Since its beginnings, the secretive middle-class education sector has covered-up for the second-rate education service the state provides for the working class. The anger aroused within the black community has changed all that. They want to know about the school system and what it is doing to their children. Teachers cannot tolerate much criticism of their authority but at the same time black pupils and their parents will not tolerate their second-rate treatment within the schools. They fight back.

The price that black school children are paying for their struggle against a repressive education system is a heavy one. The Authorities have deliberately and cynically ignored the rights of pupils of access to education. In their anxiety to defend and cover up for the system, the provision of appeal, notification, consultation with parents have all been swept aside. In the need to bludgeon all opposition, Suspension is being used for the racist oppression of school children. Nonetheless, there are and have been substantial victories in the struggle. The Leeds case is one example. It shows how Suspension can be fought against by a consistent campaign. Black parents and their children will defend their right to a decent education. They are in the vanguard of the struggle against the capitalist education system and in supporting this struggle we support the demand for a proper education system for the working class as a whole.

Sue Davidson

Fight racist and elitist selective education

Since 2007 every school has had to submit its census twice a year.  This information identifies free school meal eligibility, ethnicity (numbers of EAL pupils – English as an additional language) and Special Educa­tional Needs. The numbers determine how much funding the government gives to each school.

This year the Department for Edu­cation has requested additional information, the nationality and country of birth of pupils to be confirmed by presentation of the child’s passport. This information is due to be sent to Department of Education on 6 Oct­ober and schools have to check nationality status every term.

Parents can, before this date, declare that they want to opt-out and refuse to give this information to schools. If they have already given this information before this date, they can instruct schools not to send this information to central government as it will end up in the hands of immigration enforcement. All schools, nurseries and child-minders should be giving parents an option to opt out from providing this additional information. School letters should have the option ‘I do not wish to provide this information’ and also state that ‘there is no requirement for the school to see your passport or birth certificate’.

Some schools and nurseries in Hackney already collected this information in July and the result was the deportation of up to 50 schoolchildren. It is vital that no parents comply so that there is a united front against this ruling. There is a good leaflet advising parents of their right to opt out at which provides a template letter for parents to send to their school or nursery. Solid­arity of all parents/carers can succeed against this piece of state racism.

Read more ...

The unacceptable face of capitalist education

Falmer academy protest

The attack on state education, initiated by the Labour Party’s smear on ‘bog standard’ local authority schools in 2001, has led to the massive plunder of public funds under the academies project. The budget of the Department for Education is shrinking in real terms, just like the BHS pension fund, but a stream of cash flows into the pockets of a few. While BHS boss Philip Green’s family received £307m in BHS dividends from 2002 to 2004, the pension fund of 11,000 current and 20,000 future retirees dried up. While school finances freeze, the rip-off merchants help themselves.

Ian Cleland, the chief executive of Academy Transformation Trust, which runs 21 schools in the Midlands and the east of England, receives an annual salary of £180,000 and expenses, which include joint insurance with his wife on a XJ Premier Luxury V6 Jaguar car (plus a £500 service and £402 for new tyres). In March of this year Cleland said the Trust was looking to save £500,000, and staff were required to reapply for their jobs: ‘The education sector is facing a number of significant financial challenges across the country with all schools, academies and multi-academy trusts being affected. As a result it is essential that we review our costs and consider where savings can be made, without impacting on the quality of education.’ (The Observer 24 July 2016)

Read more ...

Keep the caterers: University of Manchester staff win fight over jobs and pay

The University of Manchester was left with egg on its face after it was forced to backtrack on plans to make 43 catering staff on campus and in halls of residence redundant.

The staff are employed by university subsidiary UMC Limited on zero-hours contracts with none of the protections and benefits of in-house employment. They were informed of these redundancies in March, just one month after the university agreed to pay them the Living Wage – itself the result of years of pressure from staff and students on campus. The proposals would also have changed the contracts of remaining staff from full-time to term-time, reducing their salaries by a third.

Read more ...